YouTube Wasn't Built for Discovering Music — So We Built Something That Is
Alan More, Founder of Videojam · May 31, 2026 · 3 min read
YouTube is the world's largest music video library and one of its worst places to actually discover music. On the difference between a warehouse and a record store.
YouTube holds the largest collection of music videos ever assembled. Almost every video that matters lives there somewhere. And it is, paradoxically, one of the worst places on the internet to discover music — to find the thing you didn't already know you were looking for.
This isn't a knock on YouTube. It's a description of what it is. YouTube is a warehouse. Warehouses are extraordinary at storage and terrible at browsing, and no amount of recommendation engineering changes the fundamental nature of the building.
The warehouse problem
Walk into a warehouse looking for something specific and it's unbeatable — everything's there, indexed, retrievable. But you can't browse a warehouse the way you browse a record store. There's no one who's arranged the shelves with a point of view, no staff pick taped to the bin, no sense that a human has walked the aisles and decided what's worth your attention. There's just everything, ranked by metrics that have nothing to do with quality.
YouTube's organizing logic is engagement, not taste. The videos that rise are the ones that perform — long watch times, broad appeal, algorithmic momentum. That system is brilliant at resurfacing what's already popular and nearly useless at surfacing the small, strange, excellent thing that deserves a hundred times its current audience. The warehouse has no opinion about what's good. It only knows what's moving.
What a record store does that a warehouse can't
The old record store wasn't valuable because it had the most records — it usually had far fewer than the warehouse. It was valuable because someone chose them. The selection itself was the product. You went because you trusted the taste behind the shelves, and you left with things you'd never have searched for, because a person who knew more than you decided they were worth pulling to the front.
That's the thing the warehouse model lost, and it's the thing worth rebuilding. Not more videos — there are already more videos than any human could watch in ten lifetimes. Better arrangement. A point of view. The sense that someone has been through the overwhelming everything and come back to tell you where to look.
Building the record store on top of the warehouse
Here's the part that makes this practical rather than nostalgic: you don't have to replace the warehouse to fix the browsing problem. The videos can live where they live. What's been missing is the layer on top — the curation, the arrangement, the human judgment about what's worth surfacing and how to put it in context.
That's the whole idea behind what we're building. Not a competitor to the world's biggest video library — an answer to the question that library was never designed to ask: of all of this, what should I actually watch?
The warehouse will always win on size. We're not interested in size. We're interested in the answer.
Related on Videojam
More in Curation Rationale
An Engineer's Love Letter to the Music Video
Somewhere between art film and advertisement, the music video became one of the most inventive visual forms of the last fifty years. A case for taking it seriously — and loving it openly.
Jun 5, 2026
The Case Against the Autoplay Rabbit Hole
Autoplay promises endless discovery and delivers a slow drift into sameness. On why the feature that never lets you stop is quietly the enemy of actually finding anything.
May 30, 2026
Why We Curate Instead of Letting an Algorithm Decide
Recommendation engines are extraordinary at keeping you watching and terrible at showing you something that matters. A case for the old, human, unscalable art of curation.
May 29, 2026